

Artifacts and symbols collected, stored, and disseminated in order to document the constituent elements of life, extant or extinct, at any scale of time and space.
These elements are biological and encompass anything that contributes to the structure and function of life at any scale, from the microscopic to the level of the planet, and to the continuation of life, that is, its ability to persist and evolve over time.

Source: Garnier et al. (2025)

(a) Data and metadata make up (b) datasets.
Multiple datasets in one location form a (c) database.
(d) Aggregators compile data from many databases.
Repackagers transform data in a way that makes it more accessible for all audiences.
External users (e.g. scientists, industries, government agencies etc.) access raw data by going through any or all of these data sharing portals.
Source: Blair et al. (2020)



It is recommended to prioritize deposits in trusted thematic repositories, followed by institutional repositories and, as a last resort, generic repositories.

Data repositories […] and databases […] are the basis for progress but are not representative in their taxonomic and geographical coverage of the Earth’s biodiversity1.
In recent decades, the availability and accessibility of biodiversity data and the profusion of portals, tools, and platforms through which to utilize them have increased rapidly […] it can create confusion in navigating biodiversity data within a highly saturated landscape2
Our review showed that each biodiversity database holds unique scientific value because they cover different spatial extents, taxonomic groups, and record types3.

But there are links between biodiversity databases (and biodiversity data aggregators), thanks to FAIR process (data & metadata standards, controlled vocabularies, etc.)

The Past, Present, and Future of Online Biodiversity Knowledge Systems
