
Current challenges
Data and metadata
Data types
Framework and good practices


Heterogeneity (data types, origin, standards) &
Diversity of “objects” to be linked together1
Loss of information over time2
Second French Plan for Open Science1
France is committed to ensuring that the results of scientific research are open to all, researchers, companies and citizens, without hindrance, without delay, without payment.

Data life cycle

FAIR Principles

Reproducibility

Flux and stocks of data

“Research data are defined as factual records in the form of figures, texts, images and sounds which are used as the main sources for scientific research and which the scientific community generally recognizes as being necessary to validate research results”1.

“Metadata, which can be simply defined as “data about data,” is a way of naming things and representing data and their relationships […] Metadata is structured information that describes, explains, locates, or otherwise makes it easier to retrieve, use or manage an information resource”2.
Artifacts and symbols collected, stored, and disseminated in order to document the constituent elements of life, extant or extinct, at any scale of time and space.
These elements are biological and encompass anything that contributes to the structure and function of life at any scale, from the microscopic to the level of the planet, and to the continuation of life, that is, its ability to persist and evolve over time.

Source: Blair J et al. (2020) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e32765
Repackagers transform data in a way that makes it more accessible for all audiences. External users (e.g. scientists, industries, government agencies etc.) access raw data by going through any or all of these data sharing portals.
A type of database that stores and provides access to data in tables that can be linked to each through shared columns and rows, called relations, with unique identifiers (keys) that show the different relationships between tables.
Tabular datasheets used to be enough to store ecological data. Nowadays, With the increasing amount of biodiversity and environmental data, the use of relational databases is becoming much more frequent.


Link this information with your biodiversity research projects
Imagine: you’re wondering about the distribution of a given species.

but also: what are the intra-population variations ? DNA, trait measurements ? phylogeny ?
where are they spatially ? in which proportions ?
when were they observed or sampled ? repeated measures ? time stamp or global period ?
how were they collected ? biases ? pseudoreplication ? true absences ?
why and who : citizen science ? opportunistic ? funding ?
According to the EML classification1


According to Kissling WD et al. (2018)

Repeated measures, such as long term surveys, allowing to look at evolution (of abundances, biomass, etc) over time.
Time series analyses

Generic term that starts whenever there are spatial coordinates (long/lat) associated with an observation. May also refer to remote sensing images, GIS.
Again a very generic term, ranges from spreadsheets of data occurrences to DNA sequences, and text mining (systematic reviews, web scrapping, etc).
Format1
Protocols and methods2
Thematic and/or “other classifications”
Data life cycle

FAIR Principles

Reproducibility

Flux and stocks of data


The data lifecycle is the set of stages of management, conservation and dissemination of research data, associated with research activities.
For more information: PNDB
A set of guiding principles for managing research data to make it Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable by humans and machines1.
This is the way!


For more information: PNDB



Reproducibility is about results that can be obtained by someone else (or you in the future) given the same data and the same code. This is a technical problem.
We talk about Computational reproducibility


Computational reproducibility frequently refers to the ability to generate equivalent analytical outcomes from the same data set using the same code and software1.
[…] all raw data and metadata, code, programming scripts, and bespoke software necessary for fully replicating any analyses that lead to inferences made in a published study2.
An article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data, that produced the result.
Claerbout & Karrenbach (1992)1
An article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data, that produced the result.
Claerbout & Karrenbach (1992)1
Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims (…).
Peng (2011)2
An article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data, that produced the result.
Claerbout & Karrenbach (1992)1
Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims (…).
Peng (2011)2
Sharing the code and the data is now a prerequisite for publishing in many journals

Each degree of reproducibility requires additional skills and time. While some of those skills (e.g. literal programming, version control, setting up environments) pay off in the long run, they can require a high up-front investment.
According to Wilson et al. (2017)1, good practices for a better reproducibility can be organized into the following six topics:
Data management
Project organization
Tracking changes
Collaboration
Manuscript
Code & Software


Website available at: https://rdatatoolbox.github.io/

Sharing data and metadata from research activities requires making them available in repositories.
It is recommended to prioritize deposits in trusted thematic repositories (eg. InDoRES, SEANOE, …), or failing that in institutional repositories (eg. Data SUD, CIRAD Dataverse, …), or failing that, in generic repositories such as the Recherche Data Gouv repository. Resources exist for choosing the adapted and recommended data repository.
| Repositories names | Supporting by | thematic, institutional, generic | disciplinary fields | Accepted data (keywords) | embargo | Persistent identifier | Volume limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InDoRES | CNRS-Ecology, MNHN | thematic ( and institutional) | Ecology, Environment, Bio-archaeology | Environmental, ecological and geographical data | yes | DOI | 2 GB per data set but planned to increase to 4 or 5 GB soon |
| EaSy Data | Data Terra, BRGM | thematic | Earth and Environmental Sciences | Long tail data from the earth system and environment (example: project issues) | yes (2 years max.) | DOI | 5 GB per file, 100 GB per deposit. Possibility to make the request if larger volume |
| SEANOE | Ifremer | thematic (and institutional) | Oceanography | Georeferenced marine data | yes (2 years max.) | DOI | 100 GB |
| Data SUD | IRD | institutional | all fields covered by IRD agents | ??? | ??? | DOI | ??? |
| GBIF | the international GBIF community | thematic | Life sciences, Biodiversity, Animal biology, Plant biology, Ecology, Environment; Ecosystems | Taxa, occurrence data, sampling data, all standardized according to Darwin core or ABCD standards. | yes | DOI | no |
| Recherche Data Gouv | Recherche Data Gouv | generic | all fields | all | yes | DOI | ??? |
Figure from Garnier & Pavoine et al.,2025
PatriNat wrote a document (in french) to support producers and reusers of biodiversity data and metadata in:
The targets of this document are mainly researchers, managers, engineers and data technicians






Data Terra
