Reproducibility is about results that can be obtained by someone else (or you in the future) given the same data and the same code. This is a technical problem.
We talk about Computational reproducibility
An article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data, that produced the result.
Claerbout & Karrenbach (1992)1
An article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data, that produced the result.
Claerbout & Karrenbach (1992)1
Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims (…).
Peng (2011)2
An article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code and data, that produced the result.
Claerbout & Karrenbach (1992)1
Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims (…).
Peng (2011)2
Sharing the code and the data is now a prerequisite for publishing in many journals
Each degree of reproducibility requires additional skills and time. While some of those skills (e.g. literal programming, version control, setting up environments) pay off in the long run, they can require a high up-front investment.
According to Wilson et al. (2017)1, good practices for a better reproducibility can be organized into the following six topics:
Data management
Project organization
Tracking changes
Collaboration
Manuscript
Code & Software
Website available at: https://rdatatoolbox.github.io/